Question 13. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage? A. Because QV eliminates strategic behavior, communities can ignore el...
Đề bài
Question 13. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?
A. Because QV eliminates strategic behavior, communities can ignore eligibility rules and metrics, trusting square-root math alone to deliver perfect fairness in every budgeting scenario universally.
B. The Colorado example proves QV always prefers radical minorities, so public budgeting should adopt unrestricted credit limits and unlimited votes to amplify passionate voices everywhere.
C. QV suits budget prioritisation where intensity matters, yet overall fairness depends on careful eligibility design and anti-Sybil measures that constrain domination without muting engagement too.
D. Since QF levels money influence, combining it with QV would nullify minority expression, making both mechanisms redundant for community budgets and governance contexts in practice.